4.7 Article

Dependence of flow strength and deformation mechanisms in common wrought and die cast magnesium alloys on orientation, strain rate and temperature

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNESIUM AND ALLOYS
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 275-282

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2013.11.003

关键词

Constitutive equation; Effects of strain rate and temperature; Effects of orientation; Crashworthiness; Magnesium alloy

资金

  1. CCTI
  2. ASM-NGV
  3. Government of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The controlling plastic deformation mechanisms (i.e. slip or twinning) and the structural crash performance of Mg alloys are strongly influenced by loading mode, texture and microstructure. This paper summarizes the main results from an experimental program to assess these effects for commercial Mg alloy extrusions (AM30 and AZ31), sheet (AZ31), and high pressure die castings (HPDC, AM50 and AM60). Uniaxial tensile and compressive tests were performed over a wide range of strain rate and temperature (i.e. 0.00075-2800 s(-1) and 100 C-circle to 150 C-circle) using conventional servo-hydraulic and high-strain-rate universal test machines and a split-Hopkinson-bar (SHB) apparatus. In primarily-slip-dominant deformation, the true stressestrain curves showed approximate power-law behavior, and the effects of strain rate and temperature on yield strength could be approximately described by constitutive equations linearly dependent on the rate parameter, Tln(5.3 x 10(7)/(epsilon) over dot) where T is test temperature in Kelvin and (epsilon) over dot is strain rate in s(-1). In primarily-twin-dominant deformation, the effects of strain rate and temperature on yield and initial flow stress were negligible or small from quasi-static to 2800 s(-1) owing to the athermal characteristics of mechanical twinning; the effects may become more pronounced with exhaustion of twinning and increasing proportion of slip. Copyright (C) 2013, by Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据