4.7 Article

Effect of alloying elements on microstructural evolution in oxygen content controlled Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr (wt%) alloys for biomedical applications during aging

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.018

关键词

Ti alloy; Biomaterial; Age hardening; Omega phase; Transmission electron microscopy; Atom probe

资金

  1. Inter-University Cooperative Research Program of the Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University [14K0027, 15K0035]
  2. Union Tool Co., Japan
  3. EPSRC under the HEmS Programme Grant [EP/L014742/1]
  4. [15K07100]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L014742/1, EP/J013501/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K06502] Funding Source: KAKEN
  7. EPSRC [EP/J013501/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of alloying elements in Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr (wt%) (TNTZ) alloys with low Young's modulus for biomedical applications on microstructural evolution during aging, in particular, at an aging temperature of 400 degrees C have been determined. The peak hardness is obtained by co-precipitation of alpha and omega phases. O addition stabilizes omega phases; as a result, formation of omega is enhanced with increasing the O content as an alloying element, resulting in prevention of the growth of the alpha phases due to soft impingement. Because of the stress caused by the omega to alpha transformation, the alpha phase often contains defects within its internal structure. Although Zr is known to be a neutral element within Ti, here we show that Zr acts as weak beta stabilizer. At the beta/alpha interface, Zr enrichment appears to be due to a solute drag mechanism. In addition, a slight increase in Zr composition in the beta/omega interface has also been detected using atom probe. Dispersion of omega phases and segregation of Zr to the beta/alpha interface lead to fine alpha phase precipitation, resulting in an increase in the hardness of the O-added TNTZ alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据