4.7 Article

Atomic resolution characterization of strengthening nanoparticles in a new high-temperature-capable 43Fe-25Ni-22.5Cr austenitic stainless steel

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.004

关键词

Scanning transmission electron microscopy; Austenitic stainless steel; High temperature; Fatigue; Strength; Nanoparticles

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [RVO: 68081723, 13-23652S]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-60050072]
  3. Center for Emergent Materials: an NSF MRSEC [DMR-1420451]
  4. J. William Fulbright Commission in the Czech Republic
  5. MEYS [LM2015069, LQ1601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) was used to study two distinct populations of nanoparticles associated with the extraordinary strengthening of the highly-alloyed austenitic stainless steel Sanicro 25 during cyclic loading at 700 degrees C. Fully coherent and homogeneously dispersed Cu-rich nanoparticles precipitate rapidly as a result of thermal exposure, along with nanometer-sized incoherent NbC carbides that nucleate on dislocations during the cyclic loading at high temperature. The atomic structure of nanoparticles was investigated by probe-corrected high-angle annular dark-field STEM imaging. Compositional analysis of the nanoparticles was conducted using high spatial resolution energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy combined with electron energy-loss spectroscopy. Experimental observations were validated by image simulations of the Moire-like contrast exhibited by NbC carbides. The important role of both nanoparticle populations for the overall cyclic response is discussed. As a result of pinning effects and associated obstacles, dislocation motion is significantly retarded preventing formation of substructures with lower stored internal energy. With recovery heavily suppressed, forest dislocation strengthening supported by precipitation and solid solution hardening, leads to the remarkable increase of cyclic strength at elevated temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据