4.7 Article

Controlling the microstructure and mechanical properties of a metastable β titanium alloy by selective laser melting

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.04.087

关键词

Selective laser melting; Titanium alloy; Elastic modulus; Martensitic phase transformation

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0305800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602350]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610505]
  4. Key R&D Program of Hunan Province, China [2016JC2003]
  5. fund of State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Customized titanium alloy devices have become the most attractive orthopaedic implants owing to their effects in mitigating the pain and suffering of patients. This work demonstrates the feasible control of the microstructure, i.e., defects, element diffusion, and phase transformation, and the mechanical properties of a biocompatible Ti-37Nb-6Sn alloy obtained by selective laser melting (SLM). Defects such as voids and unmelted Nb particles, as well grains with random orientation or columnar grains with {100} fiber texture in the as-fabricated Ti-37Nb-6Sn alloy can be modulated by varying the solidification rate and aging effects during the deposition process. A high energy density input promotes the diffusion of Sn from the grain boundaries to the beta-matrix, resulting in an increase in the lattice constants of the beta-matrix, with low elastic modulus of the as-fabricated Ti-37Nb-6Sn alloy. However, reheating effects promotes the formation of nanoscale alpha-phase precipitates both at the grain boundaries and in the matrix. The combined effects of rapid solidification and aging induced by reheating result in a metastable beta-type Ti-37Nb-6Sn alloy with a Young's modulus of 66 GPa, ultimate strength of 891 MPa, and elongation of 27.5%. This method can aid the design of customized titanium devices with low elastic modulus for orthopaedic implants applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据