4.3 Article

Optimization and characterization of electrospun polycaprolactone coated with gelatin-silver nanoparticles for wound healing application

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.039

关键词

Polycaprolactone; Gelatin; Silver nanoparticle; Electrospinning; Multi-coating; Wound dressing

资金

  1. Office of Navy Research (ONR) [N62909-14-1-N011-P00001, N6290914PR00015/N00014]
  2. International University, Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City [02-BME-2016/HDSV-QLKH]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial infection and damage caused by dressing removal are two concerning problems which prolong the healing process in treatment of skin injuries. In this study, plasma treated electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold was coated with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) embedded in gelatin (Gel) by multi-immersion technique to optimize its antibacterial performance and reduce wound-scaffold adhesion. Water interaction test was used to examine the hydrophilization of PCL electrospun fibers after plasma treatment. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and weight calculation were employed to investigate the morphology and absorptive ability of the GelAg multi-coated PCL membrane (EsPCLGelAg). Antibacterial property of the membrane was evaluated using agar diffusion method against gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Mice model was also used to examine the efficiency of the membrane in healing process and its ability to prevent damage of newly formed tissue when peeling off. SEM results showed that the thickness of GelAg layer on EsPCL membrane increases correspondingly to the number of coating times. In vitro and in vivo data also demonstrated that the greater number of GelAg coating times, the more significant the antibacterial property of the membrane while not sticking to the wound site. These results suggest that multi-coating technique can be applied to optimize the antibacterial property of EsPCLGelAg scaffold and prevent removal-induced damage for wound dressing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据