4.5 Article

Non-decoupling MSSM Higgs sector and light superpartners

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2013)053

关键词

Supersymmetry Phenomenology; Hadronic Colliders

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-95ER40896]
  2. PITT PACC
  3. Australian Research Council
  4. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-13ER41976]
  5. DOE [de-sc0003930]
  6. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago [NSF PHY-1125897]
  7. Kavli Foundation
  8. NSF [1066293]
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013-00000004] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the non-decoupling region of the Higgs sector in MSSM, the heavier CP-even Higgs boson (H-0) is Standard-Model-like and close to the charged Higgs bosons (H-+/-) in mass, while other neutral Higgs bosons (h(0), A(0)) are lighter and near the Z mass. This scenario is consistent with the current Higgs search limits, although the improved sensitivity for a light charged Higgs boson search t -> H(+)b may result in certain degree of tension. We demonstrate that it can pass the stringent flavor constraints, provided there are other light SUSY particles to contribute in the loop induced processes. In turn, the non-decoupling Higgs sector implies the existence of light (left-handed) stop, sbottom and Wino-like gauginos, with mass all below 250 GeV. These light super-partners can still escape the current SUSY searches at the LHC. Dedicated searches for soft decay products should be devised for the LHC experiments to improve the searching sensitivity. The ILC would be able to cover the full spectrum region. The solutions for the viable SUSY parameters result from subtle cancellations and are often missed by the generic multiple dimensional scans, highlighting the importance of theoretical guidance in search for such special cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据