4.7 Article

Effect of laser power on oxygen and nitrogen concentration of commercially pure titanium manufactured by selective laser melting

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 110-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.03.003

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Selective laser melting; Titanium; Oxidation; Nitriding

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology as Development of high efficiency production technology for high purity titanium powder and additive manufacturing processing technology [KITECH EO-18-0012]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant by the Korea government (MSIP) [CRC-15-03-KIMM]
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [EO180012, CRC-15-03-KIMM] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the variation of mechanical properties and its causes with increasing the laser power in the fabrication of pure titanium by selective laser melting (SLM). SLM samples were fabricated using commercially pure titanium grade 1 powder when the scan speed was 1000 mm/s and the laser power as 120, 200, 280, 360, and 440 W, respectively. As the laser power increased, the hardness and strength of the samples increased gradually. During the SLM processing, the concentrations of oxygen and nitrogen in the SLM samples were increased, which resulted in the increase of hardness and strength. The SLM equipment used in this study removed oxygen in the chamber by flowing high purity argon gas and fabricates the sample while preserving the oxygen concentration in the atmosphere to 0.2%. Evaluating the possibility of oxidation and nitriding during the SLM process by thermodynamic analysis, it was found that the process occurred under conditions in which temperature and residual oxygen and nitrogen partial pressure led to oxidation and nitriding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据