4.2 Article

Red-legged kittiwake feathers link food availability to environmental changes in the Bering Sea

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 593, 期 -, 页码 261-274

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps12509

关键词

Historical ecophysiology; Feather corticosterone; St. George Island; Stable isotope analysis; Food shortage; Nutritional stress

资金

  1. North Pacific Research Board [1410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The largest breeding population of red-legged kittiwakes Rissa brevirostris has undergone a dramatic decline and subsequent recovery since 1975. The causal mechanism is hypo thesized to be climate-induced food shortages during reproduction, yet little is known about how the basin ecosystem, where breeding red-legged kittiwakes primarily forage, is affected by climate variability. We examined when and under what conditions red-legged kittiwakes experienced food shortages. Head feathers (winter) and first primary feathers (summer; n = 24 and 27 yr, and 194 and 122 individuals, respectively) were collected between 1913 and 2016 on St. George Island and were analyzed for stable isotope signatures of carbon (delta C-13), nitrogen (delta N-15), and sulfur (delta S-34). Feathers were also analyzed for corticosterone concentration (fCORT), which indicates a bird's exposure to nutritional stress during feather growth. Summer fCORT concentrations were lower when values of the annual Pacific Decadal Oscillation index were positive. Winter fCORT concentrations and delta N-15 signatures increased when February sea-ice coverage was extensive. We conclude that, since 1913, warm conditions in the Bering Sea ecosystem have been associated with low nutritional stress in adult red-legged kittiwakes breeding on St. George Island. However, we found no strong evidence for isotopic shifts over this same period. A better understanding of the factors governing the abundance and availability of red-legged kittiwakes' prey is needed to predict the impact of anticipated warming on this species and its foraging habitat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据