4.7 Article

Translated Attributes as Choice Architecture: Aligning Objectives and Choices Through Decision Signposts

期刊

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 64, 期 5, 页码 2445-2459

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2703

关键词

behavioral decision making; behavioral economics; consumer behavior; choice architecture; theory; government; regulations; applications; marketing; segmentation; translated attributes; proenvironmental behavior

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [SES 0951516]
  2. Alcoa Foundation Fellowship from the American Australian Association [2787 2012]
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0951516] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  6. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1463122] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Every attribute can be expressed in multiple ways. For example, car fuel economy can be expressed as fuel efficiency (miles per gallon), fuel cost in dollars, or tons of greenhouse gases emitted. Each expression, or translation, highlights a different aspect of the same attribute. We describe a new mechanism whereby translated attributes can serve as decision signposts because they (1) activate otherwise dormant objectives, such as proenvironmental values and goals, and (2) direct the person toward the option that best achieves the activated objective. Across three experiments, we provide evidence for the occurrence of such signpost effects as well as the underlying psychological mechanism. We demonstrate that expressing an attribute such as fuel economy in terms of multiple translations can increase preference for the option that is better aligned with objectives congruent with this attribute (e.g., the more fuel-efficient car for those with proenvironmental attitudes), even when the new information is derivable from other known attributes. We discuss how using translated attributes appropriately can help align a person's choices with their personal objectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据