4.4 Article

Elevated IL-17 levels in semi-immune anaemic mice infected with Plasmodium berghei ANKA

期刊

MALARIA JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2257-x

关键词

IL-17; Semi-immune mice; Anaemia; Plasmodium berghei ANKA

资金

  1. Japanese Government Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [17301870]
  3. Nagasaki University
  4. Global COE Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Alterations in inflammatory cytokines and genetic background of the host contribute to the outcome of malaria infection. Despite the promising protective role of IL-17 in infections, little attention is given to further understand its importance in the pathogenesis of severe malaria anaemia in chronic/endemic situations. The objective of this study, therefore, was to evaluate IL-17 levels in anaemic condition and its association with host genetic factors. Methods: Two mice strains (Balb/c and CBA) were crossed to get the F1 progeny, and were (F1, Balb/c, CBA) taken through 6 cycles of Plasmodium berghei (ANKA strain) infection and chloroquine/pyrimethamine treatment to generate semi-immune status. Cytokine levels and kinetics of antibody production, CD4(+)CD25(+)T regulatory cells were evaluated by bead-based multiplex assay kit, ELISA and FACs, respectively. Results: High survival with high Hb loss at significantly low parasitaemia was observed in Balb/c and F1. Furthermore, IgG levels were two times higher in Balb/c, F1 than CBA. While CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells were lower in CBA; IL-4, IFN-gamma, IL-12 alpha and IL-17 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in Balb/c, F1. Conclusions: In conclusion, elevated IL-17 levels together with high IL-4, IL-12 alpha and IFN-gamma levels may be a marker of protection, and the mechanism may be controlled by host factor (s). Further studies of F2 between the F1 and Balb/c will be informative in evaluating if these genes are segregated or further apart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据