4.5 Article

Accelerating 3D-T1ρ mapping of cartilage using compressed sensing with different sparse and low rank models

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 1475-1491

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27138

关键词

compressed sensing; low rank models; sparse reconstruction; T-1 rho relaxation

资金

  1. NIH [R01-AR060238, R01-AR067156, R01-AR068966]
  2. Center of Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), a NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center [NIH P41-EB017183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of using compressed sensing (CS) to accelerate 3D-T-1 rho mapping of cartilage and to reduce total scan times without degrading the estimation of T-1 rho relaxation times. Methods: Fully sampled 3D-T-1 rho datasets were retrospectively undersampled by factors 2-10. CS reconstruction using 12 different sparsifying transforms were compared, including finite differences, temporal and spatial wavelets, learned transforms using principal component analysis (PCA) and K-means singular value decomposition (K-SVD), explicit exponential models, low rank and low rank plus sparse models. Spatial filtering prior to T-1 rho parameter estimation was also tested. Synthetic phantom (n = 6) and in vivo human knee cartilage datasets (n = 7) were included. Results: Most CS methods performed satisfactorily for an acceleration factor (AF) of 2, with relative T-1 rho error lower than 4.5%. Some sparsifying transforms, such as spatiotemporal finite difference (STFD), exponential dictionaries (EXP) and low rank combined with spatial finite difference (L+S SFD) significantly improved this performance, reaching average relative T-1 rho error below 6.5% on T-1 rho relaxation times with AF up to 10, when spatial filtering was used before T-1 rho fitting, at the expense of smoothing the T-1 rho maps. The STFD achieved 5.1% error at AF = 10 with spatial filtering prior to T-1 rho fitting. Conclusion: Accelerating 3D-T-1 rho mapping of cartilage with CS is feasible up to AF of 10 when using STFD, EXP or L+S SFD regularizers. These three best CS methods performed satisfactorily on synthetic phantom and in vivo knee cartilage for AFs up to 10, with T-1 rho error of 6.5%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据