4.5 Article

Chemical exchange saturation transfer fingerprinting for exchange rate quantification

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 1352-1363

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27363

关键词

CEST; CEST fingerprinting; exchange rate; magnetic resonance fingerprinting; MRF; pH

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [T32 HL116273] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR066517] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: There is an increased interest to determine the exchange rate using CEST to provide pH information. However, current CEST quantification methods require lengthy scan times and do not address magnetization transfer effects. The purpose of this work was to apply the magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) concept to CEST to achieve more efficient and accurate exchange rate quantification. Methods: The proposed CEST fingerprinting method used varying saturation powers and saturation times to create unique signal evolutions for different exchange rates. The acquired signal was matched to a predefined dictionary to determine the exchange rate. The magnetization transfer effects were also addressed in the framework of CEST fingerprinting: The simulated dictionary could predict the signal curves without magnetization transfer effects, and comparing the dictionary to the acquired signals allowed the correction of the magnetization transfer effects. The CEST fingerprinting method was compared with the conventional pulsed quantitative CEST method using omega plots in the creatine phantom study. Results: The CEST fingerprinting method has a significantly reduced scan time (10 minutes versus 50 minutes) while providing more accurate exchange rate quantification using literature values as the reference. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate that CEST fingerprinting is more efficient (5 times faster) compared with pulsed quantitative CEST. It is also shown that the results of the proposed CEST fingerprinting technique are much closer to the literature values than pulsed quantitative CEST at 3 T.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据