4.5 Article

Quantifying precision in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging with second-order motion-compensated convex optimized diffusion encoding

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 80, 期 3, 页码 1074-1087

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27107

关键词

cardiac diffusion; diffusion tensor imaging; cardiac MRI

资金

  1. graduate program in bioscience at UCLA
  2. department of radiological sciences at UCLA
  3. National Institute of Health (NIH) [NIH R01HL131975, R01HL131823]
  4. American Heart Association (AHA) [AHA16PRE27380023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To quantify the precision of in vivo cardiac DTI (cDTI) acquired with a spin echo, first-andsecond-order motion-compensated (M1M2), convex optimized diffusion encoding (CODE) sequence. Methods: Free-breathing CODE- M1M2 cDTI were acquired in healthy volunteers (N = 10) at midsystole and diastole with 10 repeated acquisitions per phase. 95% confidence intervals of uncertainty in reconstructed diffusion tensor eigenvectors ((E) over right arrow (1), (E) over right arrow (2), (E) over right arrow (3)), mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and tensor Mode were measured using a bootstrapping approach. Trends in observed tensor metric uncertainty were evaluated as a function of scan duration, image SNR, cardiac phase, and bulk motion artifacts. Results: For midsystolic scans including 5 signal averages (scan time: similar to 5 min), the median myocardial 95% confidence intervals of uncertainties were: (E) over right arrow (1): 15.5 +/- 1.28, ($) over right arrow (2): 31.2 +/- 3.58, (E) over right arrow (3): 21.863.18, MD: 0.38 +/- 0.02 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s, FA: 0.20 +/- 0.01, and Mode: 1.10 +/- 0.08. Uncertainty in all parameters increased for diastolic scans: (E) over right arrow (1): 31.9 +/- 7.18, (E) over right arrow (2): 59.6 +/- 6.88, (E) over right arrow (3) : 40.5 +/- 6.48, MD: 0.52 +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, FA: 0.23 +/- 0.01, and Mode: 1.57 +/- 0.11. Diastolic cDTI also reported higher MD (MDDIA = 1.91 +/- 0.34 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s vs. MDSYS = 1.58 +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P = 831023) and lower FA values (FA(DIA) = 0.32 +/- 0.06 vs. FA(SYS) = 0.37 +/- 0.03, P = 0.03). Conclusion: cDTI precision improved with increasing nondiffusion-weighted (b = 0) image SNR, but gains were minimal for SNR >= 25 (similar to 10 averages). cDTI precision was also sensitive to intershot bulk motion artifacts, which led to better precision for midsystolic imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据