4.7 Article

Nonhalogenated Solvent Processable and Printable High-Performance Polymer Semiconductor Enabled by Isomeric Nonconjugated Flexible Linkers

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 51, 期 13, 页码 4976-4985

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00971

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-15-1-0106, FA9550-18-1-0143]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [P2ELP2_155355]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 106-2917-I-564-023]
  4. National Science Foundation [DGE-114747, ECCS-1542152]
  5. Kodak Graduate Fellowship
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One major advantage of organic electronics is their superior processability relative to traditional silicon-based materials. However, most high-performing polymer semiconductors exhibit poor solubility and require toxic chlorinated solvents coupled with inefficient coating methods such as spin-coating for device fabrication. Therefore, developing polymer semiconductors that are processable in environmentally benign solvents and compatible with effective printing techniques while maintaining good charge transport properties is crucial for the industrialization of low-cost and lightweight plastic electronics. In this study, alkyl flexible linkers with branched tertiary carbon atoms are inserted to a high-mobility diketopyrrolopyrrole-based polymer backbone to suppress polymer aggregation in solution, decrease crystallinity, and increase free volume. The polymer readily dissolves in industrial solvents and shows a 70-fold increase in solubility compared to its fully conjugated counterpart. Furthermore, due to its high solubility, the polymer can be inkjet-printed and solution-sheared at high concentrations using eco-friendly solvents such as p-xylene and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran with a maximum hole mobility of 2.76 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) and on-off ratio above 10(5) in organic field-effect transistors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据