4.7 Article

Engineered Hsp Protein Nanocages for siRNA Delivery

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800013

关键词

gene silencing; heat shock protein; protein nanocage; siRNA delivery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51503003, 51522307]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province [20170520140JH, 20180101213JC]
  3. Young Scholar Foundation of the Science and Technology Program of Jilin Province [20170520140JH, 20180101213JC]
  4. Research Project of Science and Technology of the Education Department of Jilin Province [2016051]
  5. Science and Innovative Research Team of Young Scholars in Beihua University
  6. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences [201501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficient delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) to tumor cells still remains a great challenge. Of the various nanocarriers, protein nanocages have attracted extensive interest due to their unique structure and suitable characteristics derived from their proteinaceous nature. However, most reported protein nanocages that are developed are based on virus capsid proteins, which may raise safety concerns, including those related to gene mutation and carcinogenesis. The development of nonviral protein-based systems for siRNA delivery is greatly needed. In this study, a novel siRNA delivery system based on heat shock protein (Hsp) nanocages is developed by a genetic engineering method. The delivery system could condense siRNA into stable complexes and protect the condensed siRNA from degradation. A cellular uptake analysis shows that siRNA is introduced into tumor cells mediated by Hsp-R9 nanocages. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in HeLa-EGFP cells is significantly downregulated by Hsp-R9/siRNA complexes. The results indicate that Hsp nanocages may be a good platform for siRNA delivery into tumor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据