4.6 Article

Provenance of Late Permian volcanic ash beds in South China: Implications for the age of Emeishan volcanism and its linkage to climate cooling

期刊

LITHOS
卷 314, 期 -, 页码 293-306

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.06.009

关键词

Geochemistry; Volcanic ashes; Felsic volcanism; Emeishan large igneous province; Climate cooling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41502109, 41572097]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M582528]
  3. Cultivating Program of Middle-Aged Key Teachers of Chengdu University of Technology [KYGG201718]
  4. Innovation Team of Sedimentary Geology of Chengdu University of Technology [KYTD201703]
  5. Australian Research Council [FL160100168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whole-rock geochemistry and zircon trace element, U-Pb and Hf isotopic data for Upper Permian volcanic ash at Shangsi show a significant change in source from the Emeishan Large Igneous Province (LIP) to a convergent plate margin magmatic arc. The lower stratigraphic samples display high Al2O3/TiO2 ratios, strong negative Eu anomalies, and no depletion in high field strength elements. Zircons with ages of ca. 260 Ma from these ashes have a geochemical affinity to within-plate-type magmas and with felsic ignimbrites from the uppermost part of the Emeishan volcanic succession at Binchuan. These features, combined with relatively high epsilon(Hf)(t) values and low Th/Nb ratios in the zircons, imply a late-stage felsic volcanic origin related to Emeishan LIP. The upper stratigraphic samples at Shangsi display significant depletion in Nb and Ti; zircons separated from these volcanic ashes are chemically similar to those from arc-related/orogenic rocks, indicative of a magmatic arc source. Combined with published high-precision CA-TIMS data for these volcanic ash layers, the Emeishan volcanism can be constrained to between ca. 260-257.8 Ma. The age of Emeishan volcanism is consistent with the Wuchiapingian climate cooling event, supporting a potential linkage between these two phenomena. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据