4.2 Article

Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue thickness and early impairment of left ventricular systolic function in patients with preserved ejection fraction

期刊

HEART AND VESSELS
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 1010-1015

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-015-0650-8

关键词

Echocardiography; Epicardial adipose tissue; Impairment; Left ventricular systolic function; Lifestylerelated disease; S '; TMAD %; Women

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24500866] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is metabolically bioactive fat. The present study aimed to clarify the relationship between EAT amount and early impairment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF), all evaluated echocardiographically. Participants comprised 62 elderly women (mean age +/- A standard deviation, 68 +/- A 11 years) with lifestyle-related diseases and EF a parts per thousand yen 60 %. EAT amount was evaluated as thickness. Parameters suggesting early impairment of systolic function such as decreases in systolic mitral annular velocity (S') and tissue mitral annular displacement percentage (TMAD %) were evaluated along with EF. Correlations between EAT thickness and these LV systolic functions were assessed. Influences of various factors on the resultant significant relationships were also assessed. EAT thickness correlated inversely with S' and TMAD % (r = -0.402, p = 0.001 and r = -0.585, p < 0.001, respectively), but did not correlate with EF (r = 0.054, not significant). These significant relationships were maintained after considering factors such as body mass index, age, presence of lifestyle-related diseases and blood test results. A significant relationship existed between EAT amount and early impairment of LV systolic function in patients with preserved EF. Accumulation of EAT might contribute to the initial development of LV systolic dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据