4.2 Article

Mutations in Epilepsy and Intellectual Disability Genes in Patients with Features of Rett Syndrome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 167, 期 9, 页码 2017-2025

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37132

关键词

whole exome sequencing; Rett syndrome; MECP2; CDKL5; FOXG1; STXBP1; SCN8A; genetic; mutations; deletions

资金

  1. Intellectual And Developmental Disabilities Research Center [NIH P30HD018655]
  2. Dravet Syndrome Foundation
  3. NICHD [2U54 HD061222]
  4. International Rett Syndrome Foundation
  5. NINDS [K23 NS069784, K12 NS079414-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rett syndrome and neurodevelopmental disorders with features overlapping this syndrome frequently remain unexplained in patients without clinically identified MECP2 mutations. We recruited a cohort of 11 patients with features of Rett syndrome and negative initial clinical testing for mutations in MECP2. We analyzed their phenotypes to determine whether patients met formal criteria for Rett syndrome, reviewed repeat clinical genetic testing, and performed exome sequencing of the pro-bands. Using 2010 diagnostic criteria, three patients had classical Rett syndrome, including two for whom repeat MECP2 gene testing had identified mutations. In a patient with neonatal onset epilepsy with atypical Rett syndrome, we identified a frameshift deletion in STXBP1. Among seven patients with features of Rett syndrome not fulfilling formal diagnostic criteria, four had suspected pathogenic mutations, one each in MECP2, FOXG1, SCN8A, and IQSEC2. MECP2 mutations are highly correlated with classical Rett syndrome. Genes associated with atypical Rett syndrome, epilepsy, or intellectual disability should be considered in patients with features overlapping with Rett syndrome and negative MECP2 testing. While most of the identified mutations were apparently de novo, the SCN8A variant was inherited from an unaffected parent mosaic for the mutation, which is important to note for counseling regarding recurrence risks. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据