4.6 Article

Molecular Interactions behind the Self-Assembly and Microstructure of Mixed Sterol Organogels

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 34, 期 29, 页码 8629-8638

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01208

关键词

-

资金

  1. BBSRC DRINC project. [BBSRC] [BB/M027449/1, BB/M027597/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/L000253/1]
  3. Royal Society of Edinburgh/Scottish Government
  4. BBSRC [BB/M027597/1, BB/M027449/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. EPSRC [EP/M022609/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we have employed docking and atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations supported by complementary experiments using atomic force microscopy, rheology, and spectroscopy to investigate the self-assembled structure of beta-sitosterol and gamma-oryzanol molecules into cylindrical tubules in a nonaqueous solvent. Docking models of several phytosterols, including sitosterol, with oryzanol and other sterol esters demonstrate that for systems to form tubules, the phytosterol sterane group must be stacked in a wedge shape with the ester sterane group and a hydrogen bond must form between the hydroxyl group of the phytosterol and the carbonyl group of the ester. MD of the self-assembled structure were initiated with the molecules in a roughly cylindrical configuration, as suggested from previous experimental studies, and the configurations were found to be stable during 50 ns simulations. We performed MD simulations of two tubules in proximity to better understand the aggregation of these fibrils and how the fibrils interact in order to stick together. We found that an interfibril network of noncovalent bonds, in particular van der Waals and pi-pi contacts, which is formed between the ferulic acid groups of oryzanol through the hydroxyl, methoxy, and aromatic groups, is responsible for the surface-to-surface interactions between fibrils; an observation supported by molecular spectroscopy. We believe that these interactions are of primary importance in creating a strong organogel network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据