4.5 Article

Exercise pathophysiology and sildenafil effects in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

期刊

HEART
卷 101, 期 8, 页码 637-644

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306851

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO), Belgium
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Symptoms in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) predominantly occur during exercise, while haemodynamic assessment is generally performed at rest. We hypothesised that exercise imaging of RV function would better explain exercise limitation and the acute effects of pulmonary vasodilator administration than resting measurements. Methods Fourteen patients with CTEPH and seven healthy control subjects underwent cardiopulmonary testing to determine peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO(2)peak) and ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2) at the anaerobic threshold. Subsequently, cardiac MRI was performed at rest and during supine bicycle exercise with simultaneous invasive measurement of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) before and after sildenafil. Results During exercise, patients with CTEPH had a greater increase in the ratio of mPAP relative to cardiac output (CO) than controls (6.7 (5.1-8.7) vs 0.94 (0.8-61.8) mm Hg/L/min; p<0.001). Stroke volume index (SVi) and RVEF increased during exercise in controls, but not in patients with CTEPH (interaction p<0.001). Sildenafil decreased the mPAP/CO slope and increased SVi and RVEF in patients with CTEPH (p<0.05) but not in controls. In patients with CTEPH, RVEF reserve correlated moderately with VO(2)peak (r=0.60; p=0.030) and VE/VCO2 (r=-0.67; p=0.012). By contrast, neither VO(2)peak nor VE/VCO2 correlated with resting RVEF. Conclusions Exercise measures of RV function explain much of the variance in the exercise capacity of patients with CTEPH while resting measures do not. Sildenafil increases SVi during exercise in patients with CTEPH, but not in healthy subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据