4.6 Article

The Lγ Phase of Pulmonary Surfactant

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 34, 期 22, 页码 6601-6611

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00460

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL54209, HL130130, HL136734]
  2. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41GM103393]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine how different components affect the structure of pulmonary surfactant, we measured X-ray scattering by samples derived from calf surfactant. The surfactant phospholipids demonstrated the essential characteristics of the L-gamma phase: a unit cell with a lattice constant appropriate for two bilayers, and crystalline chains detected by wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS). The electron density profile, obtained from scattering by oriented films at different relative humidities (70-97%), showed that the two bilayers, arranged as mirror images, each contain two distinct leaflets with different thicknesses and profiles. The detailed structures suggest one ordered leaflet that would contain crystalline chains and one disordered monolayer likely to contain the anionic compounds, which constitute similar to 10% of the surfactant phospholipids. The spacing and temperature dependence detected by WAXS fit with an ordered leaflet composed of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine. Physiological levels of cholesterol had no effect on this structure. Removing the anionic phospholipids prevented formation of the L-gamma phase. The cationic surfactant proteins inhibited L-gamma structures, but at levels unlikely related to charge. Because the L-gamma phase, if arranged properly, could produce a self-assembled ordered interfacial monolayer, the structure could have important functional consequences. Physiological levels of the proteins, however, inhibit formation of the L-gamma structures at high relative humidities, making their physiological significance uncertain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据