4.6 Article

Monitoring Thiol-Ligand Exchange on Au Nanoparticle Surfaces

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 1700-1710

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Planck Graduate Center (MPGC)
  2. State Excellence Cluster CINEMA
  3. [SFB 1066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface functionalization of nanoparticles (NPs) plays a crucial role in particle solubility and reactivity. It is vital for particle nucleation and growth as well as for catalysis. This raises the quest for functionalization efficiency and new approaches to probe the degree of surface coverage. We present an (in situ) proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 NMR) study on the ligand exchange of oleylamine by 1-octadecanethiol as a function of the particle size and repeated functionalization on Au NPs. Ligand exchange is an equilibrium reaction associated with Nernst distribution, which often leads to incomplete surface functionalization following standard literature protocols. Here, we show that the surface coverage with the ligand depends on the (i) repeated exchange reactions with large ligand excess, (ii) size of NPs, that is, the surface curvature and reactivity, and (iii) molecular size of the ligand. As resonance shifts and extensive line broadening during and after the ligand exchange impede the evaluation of H-1 NMR spectra, one- and two-dimensional F-19 NMR techniques (correlation spectroscopy and diffusion ordered spectroscopy) with 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecanthiol as the fluorinated thiol ligand were employed to study the reactions. The enhanced resolution associated with the spectral range of the F-19 nucleus allowed carrying out a site-specific study of thiol chemisorption. The widths and shifts of the resonance signals of the different fluorinated carbon moieties were correlated with the distance to the thiol anchor group. In addition, the diffusion analysis revealed that moieties closer to the NP surface are characterized by a broader diffusion coefficient distribution as well as slower diffusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据