4.6 Article

Study of Fluorescence Quenching Ability of Graphene Oxide with a Layer of Rigid and Tunable Silica Spacer

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 603-611

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03465

关键词

-

资金

  1. USA National Science Foundation [CHE 1709160]
  2. University of North Dakota Postdoctoral Pilot Program - UND VPR
  3. Art and Science College, Applied Research to Address the State's Critical Needs Initiative grant - College of Arts & Sciences of UND
  4. North Dakota Industrial Commission [G-041-081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fluorescence quenching property of graphene oxide (GO) has been newly demonstrated and applied for fluorescence imaging and biosensing. In this work, a new nanostructure was designed for effectively studying the quenching ability of GO. The key element in this design is the fabrication of a layer of rigid and thickness adjustable silica spacer for manipulating the distance between the GO and fluorophores. First, a silica core modified with organic dye molecules was prepared, followed by the formation of a silica shell with a tunable thickness. Afterward, the GO was wrapped around silica nanoparticles based on the electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged GO and positively charged silica. The quenching efficiency of GO to different dye molecules was studied at various spacer thicknesses and varying concentrations of GO. Fluorescence lifetime of fluorophores was measured to determine the quenching mechanism. We found that the quenching efficiency of GO was still around 30% when the distance between dyes and GO was increased to more than 30 nm, which indicated the long-distance quenching ability of GO and confirmed the previous theoretical calculation. The quenching mechanisms were proposed schematically based on our experimental results. We expected that the proposed nanostructure could act as a feasible model for studying GO quenching property and shed light on designing GO-based fluorescence sensing systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据