4.7 Article

Integrating modified cuckoo algorithm and creditability evaluation for QoS-aware service composition

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 64-81

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.10.027

关键词

Web service composition; QoS; Credibility evaluation; Multi-objective optimization

资金

  1. NSFC [61672152, 61232007, 61532013]
  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Wireless Communications Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

QoS-aware Web service composition is regarded as one of the fundamental issues in service computing. Given the open and dynamic internet environment, which lacks a central control of individual service providers, we propose in this paper a novel method that seamlessly considers Quality of Service (QoS) and credibility of service providers to achieve optimal service compositions. Instead of using creditability as one of the QoS attributes, we treat it as the overall capability of a service provider to deliver its promised QoS. We aggregate both user experience (i.e., user trust) and track record (i.e., service reputation) of a provider for accurate creditability evaluation. To facilitate user decision making when multiple (and sometimes conflicting) QoS attributes are involved, we develop an automatic weight calculation approach based on rough set theory and a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, which assigns higher weights to the more discriminative attributes. Finally, to achieve an optimal service composition, a two phase optimization process is employed, where local optimization chooses services based on creditable QoS assessment and global optimization tackles a multi-objective problem using an effective cuckoo search algorithm. Extensive experimental results show that the proposed QoS-aware service composition approach achieves desirable QoS with credibility guarantees. The performance of our proposed approach also significantly outperforms other competitive methods. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据