4.3 Article

Short-term functional advantages after medial unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty

期刊

KNEE
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 638-643

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.04.009

关键词

Gait; Partial knee arthroplasty; Strength; Total knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There are many uncertainties about the advantages and disadvantages of using unicompartmental (UKA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to treat patients with knee osteoarthritis. It is important to have sufficient early postoperative quadriceps strength for long-term, self-reported and gait-related outcomes after knee arthroplasty, but very limited comparative data exist regarding UKA and TKA patients. Methods: This study assessed isometric quadriceps strength, spatio-temporal gait parameters (walking speed, step length, single-limb support phase) and self-reported outcomes (pain, function, stiffness) in 18 TKA and 18 UKA patients six months after surgery, as well as in 18 healthy controls. Results: Quadriceps strength of TKA, but not of UKA patients, was lower than that of controls (P < 0.05). UKA patients demonstrated better gait function in terms of a longer single-limb support phase than TKA patients (P < 0.01), which agreed with better self-reported pain (P < 0.05), function (P < 0.01) and stiffness (P < 0.05) scores compared to TKA patients. Conclusions: Six months after surgery, UKA patients showed better short-term quadriceps strength and gait function compared to TKA patients, together with less self-reported knee pain and stiffness. Patients eligible for UKA may experience less functional impairments compared to those who require TKA. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据