4.7 Article

Excessive neutrophil extracellular trap formation in ANCA-associated vasculitis is independent of ANCA

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 94, 期 1, 页码 139-149

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.01.013

关键词

ANCA-associated vasculitis; neutrophil extracellular traps

资金

  1. Dutch Kidney Foundation [KJPB12.028]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  3. ERA-EDTA young fellowship program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are auto-antigenic strands of extracellular DNA covered with myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase3 (PR3) that can be a source for the formation of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCAs). The presence of NETs was recently demonstrated in renal tissue of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). NET formation was enhanced in AAV, suggesting that MPO-ANCA could trigger NET formation, supporting a vicious circle placing NETs in the center of AAV pathogenesis. Here we investigated NET formation in 99 patients with AAV by a novel highly sensitive and automated assay. There was a significant excess of ex vivo NET formation in both MPO-ANCA-and PR3-ANCApositive patients with AAV compared to healthy individuals. Excessive NET formation did not correlate with serum ANCA levels. Likewise, immunoglobulin G depletion had no effect on excessive NET formation in patients with AAV, indicating an ANCA-independent process. Next, we explored the relation of excessive NET formation to clinical disease in ten patients with AAV and showed that excessive NET formation was predominantly found during active disease, more so than during remission. Excessive NET formation was found in patients with AAV hospitalized for disease relapse but not during severe infection. Thus, excessive NET formation in AAV is independent of ANCA, and an excess of ex vivo NET formation was related to active clinical disease in patients with AAV and a marker of autoimmunity rather than infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据