4.7 Article

Legumain, an asparaginyl endopeptidase, mediates the effect of M2 macrophages on attenuating renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 94, 期 1, 页码 91-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.12.025

关键词

legumain; M2 macrophage; renal interstitial fibrosis; UUO

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270774]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB967200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two distinct macrophage phenotypes contribute to kidney injury and repair during the progression of renal interstitial fibrosis; proinflammatory (M1) and antiinflammatory (M2) macrophages. Legumain, an asparaginyl endopeptidase of the cysteine protease family, is overexpressed in macrophages in some pathological conditions. However, the macrophage subtype and function of macrophagederived legumain remains unclear. To resolve this we tested whether M2 macrophages contribute to the accumulation of legumain in the unilateral ureteral obstruction model. Legumain-null mice exhibited more severe fibrotic lesions after obstruction compared with wild-type control. In vitro, IL4-stimulated M2 polarization led to the overexpression and secretion of legumain. The levels of fibronectin and collagen I/III, major components of the extracellular matrix, were reduced in the conditioned medium of TGF-b1-stimulated tubular epithelial cells or fibroblasts after treatment with legumain or conditioned medium from IL4-stimulated macrophages. Administration of the legumain inhibitor RR-11a exacerbated fibrotic lesions following obstruction. Therapeutically, adoptive transfer of legumain-overexpressing macrophages or IL4stimulated macrophages ameliorated the deposition of collagen and fibronectin induced by ureteral obstruction, either in the wild-type mice or in lgmn-/-mice. Thus, M2 macrophages overexpress and secret legumain and legumain mediates the anti-fibrotic effect of M2 macrophages in obstructive nephropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据