4.7 Article

Knockout of the urate oxidase gene provides a stable mouse model of hyperuricemia associated with metabolic disorders

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 69-80

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.031

关键词

apoptosis; diabetes; inflammation; renal pathology

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0903400]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [81520108007, 31371272, 81500346, 81441401, 31471195]
  3. Science and Technology Development Project of Shandong Province [2014GSF118013]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571997]
  5. Henry Ford Immunology Program Research Fund [T71015, T71016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The urate oxidase (Uox) gene encodes uricase that in the rodent liver degrades uric acid into allantoin, forming an obstacle for establishing stable mouse models of hyperuricemia. The loss of uricase in humans during primate evolution causes their vulnerability to hyperuricemia. Thus, we generated a Uox-knockout mouse model on a pure C57BL/6J background using the transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) technique. These Uox-knockout mice spontaneously developed hyperuricemia (over 420 mu mol/l) with about 40% survival up to 62 weeks. Renal dysfunction (elevated serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen) and glomerular/tubular lesions were observed in these Uox-knockout mice. Male Uox-knockout mice developed glycol-metabolic disorders associated with compromised insulin secretion and elevated vulnerability to streptozotocin-induced diabetes, whereas female mice developed hypertension accompanied by aberrant lipo-metabolism. Urate-lowering drugs reduced serum uric acid and improved hyperuricemia-induced disorders. Thus, uricase knockout provides a suitable mouse model to investigate hyperuricemia and associated disorders mimicking the human condition, suggesting that hyperuricemia has a causal role in the development of metabolic disorders and hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据