4.2 Article

Visualization of a finite wall-mounted cylinder wake controlled by a horizontal or inclined hole

期刊

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZATION
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 543-556

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12650-018-0482-6

关键词

Flow controlling hole; Flow separation region; Passive flow control; PIV; Low aspect ratio cylinder; Vortex; Wake

资金

  1. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science [16K06067]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [11721202, 11772035]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K06067] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A passive flow control technique, which is to drill a horizontal hole going from the front surface to the rear surface or an inclined hole going from the front surface to the top surface inside a circular cylinder of an aspect ratio H/D = 1, is proposed to control the rear recirculation region and the vortices near the free end surface. Here, both the diameter D and height H of cylinder are 70 mm. PIV measurement was performed with Reynolds number of 8570 in a water tunnel. Furthermore, in order to consider the effect of the hole position of the front surface, the cylinder models having different hole height of front surface from wall were tested. It is found that the rear recirculation zones of the horizontal hole cylinders are smaller than that of the standard cylinder. The Reynolds shear stresses and the turbulent kinetic energy are evidently reduced by the flow issued from the horizontal hole. Meanwhile, the instantaneous large-scale vortical structures of the rear recirculation zone are broken down into several small-scale vortices with decreasing the height of the horizontal hole. Although the rear separation zone of the inclined hole cylinder increases, the recirculation region near the free end surface decreases. The areas of large Reynolds shear stress and high turbulent kinetic energy increase in the rear recirculation zone. However, with increasing the height of the inclined hole, the Reynolds shear stress decreases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据