4.2 Article

Behavior of hydroxyapatite crystals in a simulated body fluid: effects of crystal face

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE CERAMIC SOCIETY OF JAPAN
卷 121, 期 1417, 页码 807-812

出版社

CERAMIC SOC JAPAN-NIPPON SERAMIKKUSU KYOKAI
DOI: 10.2109/jcersj2.121.807

关键词

Hydroxyapatite; Crystal face; Calcification; Simulated body fluid; Hydrothermal process

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT) [22107007, 2206]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22107007] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Control of calcification behaviors in osteoconductive ceramics is important for development of novel materials. Calcification behaviors of osteoconductive materials in bony defects can be assessed using a simulated body fluid (SBF). Previous studies of hydroxyapatite (HAp) ceramics have not found a clear relationship between calcification behaviors and morphology, in particular the crystal face, of HAp. In this study we have investigated calcification behaviors of rod-shaped HAp crystals with controlled crystal face in a SBF. The aspect ratios of the rod-shaped HAp was taken to be the area ratio of (the a face)/(the c face) in HAp crystals. HAp with aspect ratios ranging between approximately 10 and 17 was synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. Scale-like precipitates, which should be nonstoichiometric HAp referred to as bone-like apatite, were formed on the HAp crystals soaked in the SBF. The formation rate of bone-like apatite was estimated by measuring decreases in calcium and phosphate ion concentrations of the SBF. The formation rate increased with increasing aspect ratios of the HAp crystals. The results show that bone-like apatite was preferentially formed on the a face of the HAp crystals and that the calcification behaviors of HAp crystals in a SBF can be controlled using the aspect ratio of the HAp crystal, that is, by controlling the crystal face of HAp. (C)2013 The Ceramic Society of Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据