4.2 Review

Systematic review of risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 1026-1037

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12905

关键词

chronic hepatitis B; hepatitis B surface antigen; hepatocellular carcinoma; seroclearance

资金

  1. Self-Raised Scientific Research Fund of the Ministry of Health of Guangxi Province [Z2016512, Z2015621, GZZC15-34, Z2014241]
  2. Graduate Course Construction Project of Guangxi Medical University [YJSA2017014]
  3. Foundation Ability Enhancement Project for Young Teachers in Guangxi Universities [2018KY0122]
  4. Hunan Science and Technology Development Projects [2017SK4010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is no consensus about factors that increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with chronic hepatitis B who have achieved seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). To assess the available evidence about risk factors for HCC after HBsAg seroclearance, Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant studies published through 15 September 2017. A total of 28 studies involving more than 105411 patients with chronic hepatitis B were included. HBsAg seroclearance occurred spontaneously in 7656, while it occurred after interferon or nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in 1248. The rate of HBsAg seroclearance was 6.77%. Incidence of HCC was significantly lower among patients who experienced HBsAg seroclearance than among those who remained HBsAg-positive (1.86% vs 6.56%, P<.001). Risk factors of HCC occurrence included cirrhosis (incidence with vs without: 9.51% vs 1.66%), male gender (2.34% vs 0.64%) and age 50year at HBsAg seroclearance (2.34% vs 0.63%) (all P<.001). The available evidence suggests that HCC can develop at a low rate after HBsAg seroclearance, so periodic surveillance is recommended, especially for male patients, patients with cirrhosis and patients who experience HBsAg seroclearance when at least 50years old.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据