期刊
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 1002-1014出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12392
关键词
doctor-patient communication; mental health; patient involvement; psychiatric medication; psychiatry; shared decision making
类别
资金
- National Institute for Health Research's Research for Patient Benefit Programme [PB-PG-0909-20054]
- National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-0909-20054] Funding Source: researchfish
- National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0909-20054] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
Background Mental health care has lagged behind other health-care domains in developing and applying shared decision making (SDM) for treatment decisions. This is despite compatibilities with ideals of modern mental health care such as self-management and recoveryoriented practice, and growing policy-level interest. Psychiatric medication is a mainstay of mental health treatment, but there are known problems with prescribing practices, and service users report feeling uninvolved in medication decisions and concerned about adverse effects. SDM has potential to produce better tailoring of psychiatric medication to individuals' needs. Objectives This conceptual review argues that several aspects of mental health care that differ from other health-care contexts (e.g. forms of coercion, questions about service users' insight and disempowerment) may impact on processes and possibilities for SDM. It is therefore problematic to uncritically import models of SDM developed in other health-care contexts. We argue that decision making for psychiatric medication is better understood in a broader way that moves beyond the micro-social focus of a medical consultation. Contextualizing specific medication-related consultations within longer term relationships, and broader service systems enables recognition of the multiple processes, actors and agendas that shape how psychiatric medication is prescribed, managed and used, and which may facilitate or impede SDM. Conclusion A broad conceptualization of decision making for psychiatric medication that moves beyond the micro-social can account for why SDM in this domain remains a rarity. It has both conceptual and practical utility for evaluating research evidence, identifying future research priorities and highlighting fruitful ways of developing and implementing SDM in mental health care.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据