4.7 Article

Small bowel feeding and risk of pneumonia in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

期刊

CRITICAL CARE
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/cc12806

关键词

enteral nutrition; critical illness; small bowel feeding; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of small bowel feeding compared with gastric feeding on the frequency of pneumonia and other patient-important outcomes in critically ill patients. Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov and personal files from 1980 to Dec 2012, and conferences and proceedings from 1993 to Dec 2012 for randomized trials of adult critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) comparing small bowel feeding to gastric feeding, and evaluating risk of pneumonia, mortality, length of ICU stay, achievement of caloric requirements, duration of mechanical ventilation, vomiting, and aspiration. Independently, in duplicate, we abstracted trial characteristics, outcomes and risk of bias. Results: We included 19 trials with 1394 patients. Small bowel feeding compared to gastric feeding was associated with reduced risk of pneumonia (risk ratio [RR] 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55, 0.90; P = 0.004; I-2 = 0%) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53, 0.89; P = 0.005; I-2 = 0%), with no difference in mortality (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.90, 1.29; P = 0.43; I-2 = 0%), length of ICU stay (WMD -0.57; 95% CI -1.79, 0.66; P = 0.37; I-2 = 0%), duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD -1.01; 95% CI -3.37, 1.35; P = 0.40; I-2 = 17%), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.56, 1.42; P = 0.64; I-2 = 0%), aspiration (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.52, 1.65; P = 0.79; I-2 = 0%), and vomiting (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.53, 1.54; P = 0.72; I-2 = 57%). The overall quality of evidence was low for pneumonia outcome. Conclusions: Small bowel feeding, in comparison with gastric feeding, reduces the risk of pneumonia in critically ill patients without affecting mortality, length of ICU stay or duration of mechanical ventilation. These observations are limited by variation in pneumonia definition, imprecision, risk of bias and small sample size of individual trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据