4.7 Article

Thermal behavior of volatile palladium(II) complexes with tetradentate Schiff bases containing propylene-diimine bridge

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 135, 期 4, 页码 2573-2582

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7371-z

关键词

Palladium(II) complexes; Schiff bases; MOCVD precursors; Crystal structure; Vapor pressure

资金

  1. Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Palladium(II) complexes with tetradentate Schiff bases, Pd(acacpda)(I) and Pd(acacdmpda)(II) (acacpda(2-)N,N-(propylene)-bis(acetylacetoneiminato-), acacdmpda(2-)N,N-(2,2-dimethylpropylene)-bis(acetylacetoneiminato-)), have been synthesized, purified and characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy. Complex I was obtained for the first time, and its solid-state structure was investigated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. It has a discrete molecular structure with the Pd2+ ion being in a distorted square-planar coordination environment formed by N and O atoms of the acacpda(2-) ligand. The thermal properties of complexes I and II in condensed phase were investigated by thermogravimetry. Compound II transfers into the gas phase almost completely, while compound I evaporates with a partial decomposition. The temperature dependences of saturated vapor pressure were measured by the flow method in the temperature intervals (423-457) and (422-478) K for I and II, respectively. Both complexes were shown to exhibit an excellent stability upon sublimation. The thermodynamic parameters of sublimation processes were calculated to be: H-sub(440)=(133 +/- 4)kJmol(-1), (sub)S0=(210 +/- 9)J(molK)(-1) for I, H-sub(450)=(135 +/- 1)kJmol(-1), (sub)S0=(218 +/- 3)J(molK)(-1) for II. It has been found that the complex II with a more bulky Schiff base ligand possesses slightly higher vapor pressure values as compared to I, which is probably due to the lower contribution of weak intermolecular interactions occurring in the crystal structure of II.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据