4.7 Article

Berries grown in Brazil: anthocyanin profiles and biological properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 98, 期 11, 页码 4331-4338

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8959

关键词

berries; anthocyanins; LC; PDA; Q-TOF-MS; Eugenia uniflora; Psidium cattleianum

资金

  1. CAPES (MEC)
  2. CNPq (MCTI)
  3. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDPhytochemical profiles of two Brazilian native fruits-pitanga (red and purple) and araca (yellow and red)-as well as strawberry cultivars Albion, Aromas and Camarosa, blackberry cultivar Tupy and blueberry cultivar Bluegen cultivated in Brazil were characterized for total phenolic content and total anthocyanin content by liquid chromatography coupled to a photodiode array and a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Radical scavenging, antiherpes and cytotoxic activities of these berry extracts were also evaluated. RESULTSBlueberry presented the highest total anthocyanin content (1202mg cyanidin-O-glucoside equivalents kg(-1) fresh fruit), while strawberry cultivar Aromas presented the highest total phenolic content (13 550mg gallic acid equivalents kg(-1) fresh fruit). Liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis resulted in the identification of 21 anthocyanins. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of cyanidin-O-glucoside in yellow and red Araca fruit and the first time eight anthocyanins have been reported in pitanga fruits. DPPH and ABTS assays showed that blueberry cultivar Bluegen, blackberry cultivar Tupy and pitanga (red and purple) showed the most promising antiradical activities, respectively. No relevant cytotoxicity against three cancer cell lines or antiherpes activity was detected under the experimental conditions tested. CONCLUSIONTotal anthocyanin content of all fruits had a strong positive correlation with their free radical scavenging activity, suggesting anthocyanins contribute to the antioxidant potential of these fruits. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据