4.7 Article

Ultrasound improving the physical stability of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by almond proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 98, 期 11, 页码 4323-4330

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8958

关键词

high-intensity ultrasound; almond protein isolate; oil-in-water emulsion; physical stability; interfacial adsorption

资金

  1. NSFC [31671888, 31601546, 31501443]
  2. Doctoral Research Foundation of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology [2017BJ-21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDVegetable proteins are increasingly used to stabilize oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions. However, emulsions are thermodynamically unstable. Recently, high-intensity ultrasound (US) has been used to enhance the stability of emulsions. For these reasons, and considering almond (Prunus dulcis L.) as a good source of high-quality proteins, the aim of this work was to investigate the effect of US treatment on the stability of pre-emulsification O/W emulsions coated with almond protein isolate (API). RESULTSThe influence of API concentration (0.25-2.0gL(-1)), ion strength (0-500mmolL(-1) NaCl), and pH (3.0-7.0) on the stability of US-treated emulsions was evaluated. US treatment (200-600W, 25kHz, 15min) led to a significant reduction in the particles size of droplets in emulsions, increased critical osmotic pressure and additional protein interfacial adsorption, and thus the formation of more stable emulsions. The more unfolded and random coil structures of the proteins were detected at higher US power, facilitating protein interfacial adsorption. Increasing API concentrations resulted in higher stability of US-treated emulsions against untreated counterparts. The US-treated emulsions were more resistant to salt than untreated samples. In the range from pH3.0 to7.0, US treatment also enhanced the physical stability of emulsions compared with untreated emulsions. CONCLUSIONUS technology could be applied to produce more stable O/W food emulsions stabilized by proteins. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据