4.7 Article

Magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction based on graphene oxide/Fe3O4@polythionine nanocomposite followed by atomic absorption spectrometry for zinc monitoring in water, flour, celery and egg

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 98, 期 9, 页码 3571-3579

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8873

关键词

zinc; graphene oxide/Fe3O4@polythionine nanocomposite; flame atomic absorption spectrometry; magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction; food; water

资金

  1. Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDMagnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite has been proposed as a promising and sustainable sorbent for the extraction and separation of target analytes from food matrices. Sample preparation based on nanocomposite presents several advantages, such as desired efficiency, reasonable selectivity and high surface-area-to-volume ratio. RESULTSA new graphene oxide/Fe3O4@polythionine (GO/Fe3O4@PTh) nanocomposite sorbent was introduced for magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction and flame atomic absorption spectrometric detection of zinc(II) in water, flour, celery and egg. To fabricate the sorbent, an oxidative polymerization of thionine on the surface of magnetic GO was applied, while polythionine was simply employed as a surface modifier to improve extraction yield. The properties of the sorbent were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, vibrating sample magnetometry and Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy. The calibration curve showed linearity in the range of 0.5-30ng mL(-1). Limits of detection (S/N=3) and quantification (S/N=10) were 0.08 and 0.5ng mL(-1), respectively. CONCLUSIONThe method was applied for trace-level determination of Zn(II) in water and food samples, and its validation was investigated by recovery experiments and analyzing certified reference material. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据