4.5 Article

Superficial siderosis associated with duplicated dura mater detected by CISS reverse MRI

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 392, 期 -, 页码 38-43

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.07.001

关键词

Superficial siderosis; Fluid-filled collection; Dural defects; Magnetic resonance image; Constructive interference in steady-state; Duplicated dura

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI) [26461317]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461317] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superficial siderosis (SS) of the central nervous system is a rare disease caused by chronic or repeated hemorrhages in the subarachnoid space. Closure of dural defects is an effective therapy for SS. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), however, cannot sufficiently detect dural tears. To better detect these defects, we analyzed the clinical data of consecutive patients admitted to our department with SS and performed constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) reverse MRI of the brain and spinal cord. CISS reverse method emphasizes the contrast between the dura and cerebrospinal fluid, enabling detection of dural defects better than usual T2-weighted MRI. CISS reverse MRI detected fluid-filled collections in five of the seven SS patients we studied. These images showed that the fluid-filled collections were packed within duplicated dura mater. In three of the five, dural defects were confirmed intraoperatively. We postulate that fluid-filled collections are actually derived from dissection of the dura mater. In accordance with the Monro-Kellie hypothesis, we propose that CSF transferal into the fluid-filled collections via dural defects induces an increase in blood volume and promotes the exudation of blood from engorged vessels. In patients with SS, it is very important to repair dural defects to prevent further associated neurological impairment. CISS reverse MRI is useful for detecting such dural defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据