4.7 Article

Decentralized adaptive output-feedback control of interconnected nonlinear time-delay systems using minimal neural networks

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.11.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) [IITP-2017-2014-0-00636]
  2. Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [20174030201810]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2016R1D1A1B03931312]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a minimal-neural-networks-based design approach for the decentralized output-feedback tracking of uncertain interconnected strict-feedback nonlinear systems with unknown time-varying delayed interactions unmatched in control inputs. Compared with existing approximation-based decentralized output-feedback designs using multiple neural networks for each subsystem in lower triangular form, the main contribution of this paper is to provide a new recursive backstepping strategy for a local memoryless output-feedback controller design using only one neural network for each subsystem regardless of the order of subsystems, unmeasurable states, and unknown unmatched and delayed nonlinear interactions. In the proposed strategy, error surfaces are designed using unmeasurable states instead of measurable states and virtual controllers are regarded as intermediate signals for designing a local control law at the last step. Using Lyapunov stability theorem and the performance function technique, it is shown that all signals of the total controlled closed-loop system are bounded and the transient and steady-state performance bounds of local tracking errors can be preselected by adjusting design parameters independent of delayed interactions. (c) 2017 The Franklin Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据