4.6 Article

Quaternary Ammonium Cation Specific Adsorption on Platinum Electrodes: A Combined Experimental and Density Functional Theory Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 165, 期 2, 页码 F114-F121

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1351802jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pennsylvania State University Diefenderfer Graduate Fellowship
  2. National Science Foundation NRT [1449785]
  3. National Science Foundation [ACI-1053575]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quaternary ammonium cations provide anionic conductivity in polymer ionomers and membranes. While study has been devoted to their alkaline stability and to improving hydroxide conductivity, there are limited studies on the electrode/cationic polymer interface. We use density functional theory (DFT) and cyclic voltammetry to examine the adsorption of tetramethyl-, tetraethyl-, tetrapropyl-, and benzyltrimethylammonium cations to platinum electrode surfaces. DFT results demonstrate that adsorption to Pt(111), Pt(100), and Pt(110) is favorable at low potentials in an alkaline electrolyte and that van der Waals interactions contribute significantly. Near-surface solvation weakens the adsorption of the long alkyl chain cations, and promotes the adsorption of the shorter chain cations, suggesting adsorption of shorter-chain cations may be possible at low potentials even in acidic electrolytes. The cations retain most of their charge on adsorption, which contributes to repulsive interactions between adsorbates. Steric hindrance further contributes to coverage dependence, with only low coverage adsorption (similar to 1/9-1/4 monolayer) being stable within the electrochemical window of an aqueous electrolyte. Our experimental results show that the quaternary ammonium cations blocked surface sites, hindering the adsorption of hydrogen and hydroxide. This observation is qualitatively consistent with DFT results, showing that these organic cations favorably adsorb at low potentials in alkaline electrolytes. (C) 2018 The Electrochemical Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据