4.6 Editorial Material

Data Science Approaches for Electrochemical Engineers: An Introduction through Surrogate Model Development for Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 165, 期 2, 页码 A1-A15

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1391714jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AR0000275]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  3. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy through the Advanced Battery Material Research (BMR) Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data science, hailed as the fourth paradigm of science, is a rapidly growing field which has served to revolutionize the fields of bio-informatics and climate science and can provide significant speed improvements in the discovery of new materials, mechanisms, and simulations. Data science techniques are often used to analyze and predict experimental data, but they can also be used with simulated data to create surrogate models. Chief among the data science techniques in this application is machine learning (ML), which is an effective means for creating a predictive relationship between input and output vector pairs. Physics-based battery models, like the comprehensive pseudo-two-dimensional (P2D) model, offer increased physical insight, increased predictability, and an opportunity for optimization of battery performance which is not possible with equivalent circuit (EC) models. In this work, ML-based surrogate models are created and analyzed for accuracy and execution time. Decision trees (DTs), random forests (RFs), and gradient boosted machines (GBMs) are shown to offer trade-offs between training time, execution time, and accuracy. Their ability to predict the dynamic behavior of the physics-based model are examined and the corresponding execution times are extremely encouraging for use in time-critical applications while still maintaining very high (similar to 99%) accuracy. (C) The Author(s) 2018. Published by ECS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据