4.6 Article

Information-Based Optimal Subdata Selection for Big Data Linear Regression

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 114, 期 525, 页码 393-405

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1408468

关键词

D-optimality; Information matrix; Linear regression; Massive data; Subdata

资金

  1. Microsoft Azure for Research Award
  2. Simons Foundation Collaboration Grant for Mathematicians [515599]
  3. NSF [DMS-1506125, DMS-140751]
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1502640] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extraordinary amounts of data are being produced in many branches of science. Proven statistical methods are no longer applicable with extraordinary large datasets due to computational limitations. A critical step in big data analysis is data reduction. Existing investigations in the context of linear regression focus on subsampling-based methods. However, not only is this approach prone to sampling errors, it also leads to a covariance matrix of the estimators that is typically bounded from below by a term that is of the order of the inverse of the subdata size. We propose a novel approach, termed information-based optimal subdata selection (IBOSS). Compared to leading existing subdata methods, the IBOSS approach has the following advantages: (i) it is significantly faster; (ii) it is suitable for distributed parallel computing; (iii) the variances of the slope parameter estimators converge to 0 as the full data size increases even if the subdata size is fixed, that is, the convergence rate depends on the full data size; (iv) data analysis for IBOSS subdata is straightforward and the sampling distribution of an IBOSS estimator is easy to assess. Theoretical results and extensive simulations demonstrate that the IBOSS approach is superior to subsampling-based methods, sometimes by orders of magnitude. The advantages of the new approach are also illustrated through analysis of real data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据