4.7 Article

Acute Cardiac Effects of Severe Pre-Eclampsia

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.048

关键词

diastolic dysfunction; echocardiography; pre-eclampsia; pulmonary edema; right ventricular systolic pressure; speckle tracking echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Pre-eclampsia with severe features (PEC) is a pregnancy-specific syndrome characterized by severe hypertension and end-organ dysfunction, and is associated with short-term adverse cardiovascular events, including heart failure, pulmonary edema, and stroke. OBJECTIVES The authors aimed to characterize the short-term echocardiographic, clinical, and laboratory changes in women with PEC, focusing on right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure (RVSP) and echocardiographic-derived diastolic, systolic, and speckle tracking parameters. METHODS In this prospective observational study, the authors recruited 63 women with PEC and 36 pregnant control patients. RESULTS The PEC cohort had higher RVSP (31.0 +/- 7.9 mm Hg vs. 22.5 +/- 6.1 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and decreased global RV longitudinal systolic strain (RVLSS) (-19.6 +/- 3.2% vs. -23.8 +/- 2.9% [p < 0.0001]) when compared with the control cohort. For left-sided cardiac parameters, there were differences (p < 0.001) in mitral septal e' velocity (9.6 +/- 2.4 cm/s vs. 11.6 +/- 1.9 cm/s), septal E/e' ratio (10.8 +/- 2.8 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.6), left atrial area size (20.1 +/- 3.8 cm(2) vs. 17.3 +/- 2.9 cm(2)), and posterior and septal wall thickness (median [interquartile range]: 1.0 cm [0.9 to 1.1 cm] vs. 0.8 cm [0.7 to 0.9 cm], and 1.0 cm [0.8 to 1.2 cm] vs. 0.8 cm [0.7 to 0.9 cm]). Eight women (12.7%) with PEC had grade II diastolic dysfunction, and 6 women (9.5%) had peripartum pulmonary edema. CONCLUSIONS Women with PEC have higher RVSP, higher rates of abnormal diastolic function, decreased global RVLSS, increased left-sided chamber remodeling, and higher rates of peripartum pulmonary edema, when compared with healthy pregnant women. (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据