4.8 Article

Super-Resolution Imaging of Clickable Graphene Nanoribbons Decorated with Fluorescent Dyes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 140, 期 30, 页码 9574-9580

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b04679

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES) [DE-SC0010409]
  2. STROBE, a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center [DMR 1548924]
  3. NIH [SRR023679A]
  4. National Science Foundation [DGE-1106400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The functional integration of atomically defined graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) into single-ribbon electronic device architectures has been limited by access to nondestructive high-resolution imaging techniques that are both compatible with common supports such as Si or Si/SiO2 wafers and capable of resolving individual ribbons in dilute samples. Conventional techniques such as scanning probe (AFM, STM) or electron microscopy (SEM, TEM) have been restricted by requisite sample preparation techniques that are incompatible with lithographic device fabrication. Here we report the design and synthesis of ultralong (similar to 10 mu m) cove-type GNRs (cGNRs) featuring azide groups along the edges that can serve as a universal handle for late-stage functionalization with terminal alkynes. Copper-catalyzed click-chemistry with Cy5 fluorescent dyes gives rise to cGNRs decorated along the edges with fluorescent tags detectable by optical microscopy. The structures of individual dye-functionalized cGNRs spin-coated from a dilute solution onto transparent and opaque insulating substrates were resolved using diffraction-limited fluorescence microscopy and super-resolution microscopy (SRM) imaging techniques. Analysis of SRM images reveals an apparent width of cGNRs in the range 40-50 nm and lengths in excess of 10 mu m, the longest GNRs imaged to date. Isolated cGNRs can even be distinguished from bundles and larger aggregates as long as the center-to-center distance is greater than the apparent width.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据