4.8 Article

Pd-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidation Reactions: Strategies To Increase Catalyst Lifetimes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 140, 期 2, 页码 748-757

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b11372

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. Stanford Center for Molecular Analysis and Design Fellowship
  3. Robert N. and Anne T. Bass Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  4. Benchmark Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  5. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  6. Department of Energy (Office of Basic Energy Science, Catalysis Science Program) [DE-SC0018168]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0018168] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The palladium complex [(neocuproine)Pd(mu-OAc)](2) [OTf](2) (1; neocuproine = 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline) is an effective catalyst precursor for the selective oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols, vicinal diols, polyols, and carbohydrates. Both air and benzoquinone can be used as terminal oxidants, but aerobic oxidations are accompanied by oxidative degradation of the neocuproine ligand, thus necessitating, high Pd loadings. Several strategies to improve aerobic catalyst lifetimes were devised, guided by mechanistic studies of catalyst deactivation. These studies implicate a radical autoxidation mechanism initiated by H atom abstraction from the neocuproine ligand. Ligand modifications designed to retard H atom abstractions as well as the addition of sacrificial H atom donors increase catalyst lifetimes and lead to higher turnover numbers (TON) under aerobic conditions. Additional investigations revealed that the addition of benzylic hydroperoxides or styrene leads to significant increases in TON as well. Mechanistic studies suggest that benzylic hydroperoxides function as H atom donors and that styrene is effective at intercepting Pd hydrides. These strategies enabled the selective aerobic oxidation of polyols on preparative scales using as little as 0.25 mol % of Pd, a major improvement over previous work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据