4.8 Article

pH-Responsive Nanoparticle Superlattices with Tunable DNA Bonds

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 140, 期 15, 页码 5061-5064

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b02793

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-17-1-0348, FA9550-16-1-0150]
  2. Center for Bio-Inspired Energy Science (CBES), an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0000989]
  3. U.S. Army [W911NF-15-1-0151]
  4. State of Illinois
  5. E. I. Dupont de Nemours Co.
  6. Dow Chemical Company
  7. PPG fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials with re-configurable structures and properties have garnered significant interest in the fields of optics, electronics, magnetics, and therapeutics. DNA is a powerful and versatile building material that provides programmable structural and dynamic properties, and indeed, sequence dependent changes in DNA have already been exploited in creating switchable DNA-based architectures. However, rather than designing a new DNA input sequence for each intended dynamic change, it would be useful to have one simple, generalized stimulus design that could provide multiple different structural outputs. In pursuit of this goal, we have designed, synthesized, and characterized pH dependent, switchable nanoparticle superlattices by utilizing i-motif DNA structures as pH-sensitive DNA bonds. When the pH of the solution containing such superlattices is changed, the superlattices reversibly undergo: (i) a lattice expansion or contraction, a consequence of the pH-induced change in DNA length, or (ii) a change in crystal symmetry, a consequence of both pH-induced DNA bond breaking and bond forming processes. The introduction of i-motifs in DNA colloidal crystal engineering marks a significant step toward being able to dynamically modulate crystalline architectures and propagate local molecular motion into global structural change via exogenous stimuli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据