4.6 Article

Efficacy and safety of oxymetazoline cream 1.0% for treatment of persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea: Findings from the 52-week open label REVEAL trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 78, 期 6, 页码 1156-1163

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.01.027

关键词

alpha-adrenergic receptors; beta-adrenergic receptors; facial dermatoses; skin abnormalities; vascular skin diseases; vasoconstrictor agents

资金

  1. Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland
  2. Allergan plc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Limited treatments are available for persistent erythema of rosacea. Objective: To examine the long-term safety and efficacy of oxymetazoline cream 1.0% in patients with rosacea with moderate-to-severe persistent erythema. Methods: Patients applied oxymetazoline once daily for 52 weeks. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), skin blanching, inflammatory lesion counts, telangiectasia, disease severity, and rebound effect. Efficacy was assessed by the Clinician Erythema Assessment and Subject Self-Assessment composite score at 3 and 6 hours after the dose on day 1 and at weeks 4, 26, and 52. Results: Among 440 patients, 8.2% reported treatment-related TEAEs; the most common were application-site dermatitis, paresthesia, pain, and pruritus. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (mostly application-site TEAEs) was 3.2%. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in skin blanching, inflammatory lesions, or telangiectasia. At week 52, 36.7%, and 43.4% of patients achieved a 2-grade or greater composite improvement from baseline in both Clinician Erythema Assessment and Subject Self-Assessment 3 and 6 hours after a dose, respectively. Less than 1% of patients experienced a rebound effect following treatment cessation. Limitations: A vehicle-control group was not included. Conclusion: This long-term study demonstrated sustained safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oxymetazoline for moderate-to-severe persistent erythema of rosacea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据