4.5 Article

Bayesian inference of elastic properties with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy

期刊

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.5017840

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) through BAA [FA8650-15-M-5208]
  2. SBIR [FA8650-15-M-5074]
  3. U.S. DOE [DE-SC0008975]
  4. NSF MRSEC [DMR-1121053]
  5. NSF [CNS-0960316]
  6. AFRL [88ABW-2017-3838]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bayesian modeling and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) are utilized to formulate a robust algorithm capable of simultaneously estimating anisotropic elastic properties and crystallographic orientation of a specimen from a list of measured resonance frequencies collected via Resonance Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS). Unlike typical optimization procedures which yield point estimates of the unknown parameters, computing a Bayesian posterior yields probability distributions for the unknown parameters, and HMC is an efficient way to compute this posterior. The algorithms described are demonstrated on RUS data collected from two parallelepiped specimens of structural metal alloys. First, the elastic constants for a specimen of fine-grain polycrystalline Ti-6Al-4V with random crystallographic texture and isotropic elastic symmetry are estimated. Second, the elastic constants and crystallographic orientation for a single crystal Ni-based superalloy CMSX-4 specimen are accurately determined, using only measurements of the specimen geometry, mass, and resonance frequencies. The unique contributions of this paper are as follows: the application of HMC for sampling the Bayesian posterior of a probabilistic RUS model, and the procedure for simultaneous estimation of elastic constants and lattice-specimen misorientation. Compared to previous approaches these algorithms demonstrate superior convergence behavior, particularly when the initial parameterization is unknown, and enable substantially simplified experimental procedures. (C) 2018 Acoustical Society of America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据