4.5 Article

Subcritical water extraction of bioactive components from red ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer)

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 177-183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2017.09.029

关键词

Subcritical water extraction; Red ginseng; Ginsenoside; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. Basic the Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education [2016R1D1A1B03930300]
  3. Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through High Valueadded Food Technology Development Program - Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) [315063-3]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130012233, 2016R1D1A1B03930300] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subcritical water extraction (SWE) could be an eco-friendly excellent alternative to the traditional extraction method for extracting red ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. meyer). In this study, the bioactive components of red ginseng were analyzed by varying the temperature (150-200 degrees C) and extraction time (5-30 min) in SWE. The maximum yields of ginsenoside Rg3 and Rh2, which have 2 hydroxyl groups (200 degrees C), appeared at a higher temperature compared to ginsenoside Rg2 and Rh1, which have 3 hydroxyl groups (150 degrees C), in SWE. The antioxidative properties were maximized at 200 degrees C for 20 min (total phenolic content = 49.55 +/- 1.03 mg gallic acid equivalent/g red ginseng, maltol content = 1.19 +/- 0.01 mg/g red ginseng, the Maillard reaction product level = 1.14 +/- 0.08, and the DPPH-free-radical scavenging activity = 39.97 +/- 0.16%). Extracts of red ginseng from SWE all had higher ginsenoside concentrations and antioxidative properties compared to extracts prepared using traditional extraction methods, including ethanol, hot water, and methanol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据