4.6 Article

Significance of lymph node ratio in defining risk category in node-positive early stage cervical cancer

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 136, 期 1, 页码 48-53

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.010

关键词

Lymph node ratio; Cervical cancer

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health through M. D. Anderson's Cancer Center Support Grant [CA016672]
  2. National Institutes of Health K12 Calabresi Scholar Award [K12 CA088084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The ratio of positive to negative lymph nodes, or lymph node ratio (LNR), is an important prognostic factor in several solid tumors. The objective of this study was to determine if LNR can be used to define a high-risk category of patients with node-positive early stage cervical cancer. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with node-positive stage I or II cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic +/-para-aortic lymphadenectomy at MD Anderson from January 1990 to December 2011. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results. Ninety-five patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Median total nodes removed were 19 (range 1-58), and median number of positive nodes was 1 (range 1-12). Fifty-eight patients (61%) received radiation with concurrent cisplatin and 27 patients (28%) received radiotherapy alone. Twenty-one (22%) patients recurred. On multivariate analysis, a LNR>6.6% was associated with a worse PFS (HR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.26-7.02, p = 0.01), and a LNR>7.6% with a worse OS (HR=3.96, 95% CI 1.31-11.98, p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, positive margins were associated with worse PFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.002), and adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.01) with improved OS. Conclusions. LNR appears to be a useful tool to identify patients with worse prognosis in node-positive early stage cervical cancer. LNR may be used in addition to pathologic risk factors to tailor adjuvant treatment in this population. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据